| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marro Prolific Contributor

Joined: 04 Jul 2007 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:03 am Post subject: TRION:Z |
|
|
What do others think of this? (Just saw that Sarah Fitzgerald is promoting them).
Trion Z at Sport Discount
Personally I don't believe any of it. Would love to see the science backing the claims. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Shot Heavy Contributor

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 30 Location: Huddersfield, UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's obviously bollocks but if one's paying £20 for it I hope one believes in it!
On another note, what's with Sports Discount? Is it the worst shop online or what? Is it just me or it just seems like they can't be bothered? Is it all part of the Paul Walters iSports group? I've just got tickets for the superseries final and it wasn't the best of experiences... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marro Prolific Contributor

Joined: 04 Jul 2007 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nick Shot wrote: | | It's obviously bollocks ... |
You have quite a way with words
Does it bother anyone else that someone like SF (global squash icon) is endorsing this kind of thing, or is it fair enough as she presumably gets quite a nice pay packet from them? Or of course maybe she doesn't agree with NS and me...
Personally I find it a bit sad that anyone remotely famous promotes something so expensive yet "obviously bollocks". The thought that someone makes loads of money with quackery of pretty much any sort kind of pisses me off. To have our "heroes" encouraging them just makes it worse. (Tom Cruise/Scientology = prime example no.1).
On the other note - I've never had a problem with squash discount and their prices seem to be extremely good. Never got tickets through them though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Shot Heavy Contributor

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 30 Location: Huddersfield, UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I obviously agree with you but what can one do? For some people spending money on trinkets like this is a good thing. They genuinely believe that it helps them and maybe it does help them. I used to get upset with the pseudo-science bits like "Minus-Ions" but I won't let it bother me anymore. It's just marketing speak - not science. Squash rackets are the perfect example: "Liquid Metal", "Molecular Carbon", "nCode", "Aerogel", "Titanium"- these are all pseudo-science terms and I used to go on and on about it. Now I just relax and let it pass and play with the racket that feels best.
In this context, spending £20 on a "Minus-Ions" bracelet is as bad as spending more money on a racket with "Molecular Carbon". If it feels like it makes you play better...
I prefer those wide cotton bands. You can even wipe you sweat off with them! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fionnmacual Prolific Contributor

Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 170 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, at least Lance Armstrong had the decency to say "here is a yellow plastic bracelet, pay $5 if cancer research is important to you and you might feel good about yourself for doing it but I'm not pretending it is anything other than a charity" whereas this pseudo-science is a fraud.
Now liquid-metal etc is also a fraud and we don't complain if Shabana endorses it when he could beat me with a table tennis bat... that is how professionals make a living. So we shouldn't complain when SF endorses it. Yet something makes her go down just a little bit in my estimation when she hawks this stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Calsquasher Prolific Contributor
Joined: 29 Jun 2007 Posts: 203 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
If Ivan Lendl is endorsing it, there might be something to it. The guy is one of the richest tennis players in history and certainly doesn't need the money. Why would a guy that rich need to endorse some bracelet if he didn't believe in it? _________________ "Drive for show, drop for dough." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marro Prolific Contributor

Joined: 04 Jul 2007 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Calsquasher wrote: | | If Ivan Lendl is endorsing it, there might be something to it. The guy is one of the richest tennis players in history and certainly doesn't need the money. Why would a guy that rich need to endorse some bracelet if he didn't believe in it? |
That's exactly the response that the people selling this stuff want. That's why the get people like SF and Lendl to endorse it so we fall for the bollocks! Amazing what a famous name will do... (and no doubt amazing what a good salesman can do to persuade that famous name to sign up to endorse the product). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Haasquet Prolific Contributor

Joined: 29 Jun 2007 Posts: 80 Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nick Shot wrote: | | Squash rackets are the perfect example: "Liquid Metal", "Molecular Carbon", "nCode", "Aerogel", "Titanium"- these are all pseudo-science terms and I used to go on and on about it. Now I just relax and let it pass and play with the racket that feels best. |
I'm not sure I'd call Titanium a "pseudo-science". I mean, it is on the periodic table of the elements. It's not just a buzzword. Also, it has higher tensile strength than graphite, and it does weigh less. I admit that I hate when the marketers sell racquets as "stronger, more powerful, and lighter", but they are valid claims.
...on a personal note, though, I prefer all-graphite racquets to newer Titanium/carbon-fiber ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gavster Contributor
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nick Shot wrote: | | It's obviously bollocks but if one's paying £20 for it I hope one believes in it! |
I presume this expert analysis is based on extensive scientific research!?!?
Whilst I take their claims with a pinch of salt, the company has obviously spent a considerable amount of time researching their product and the science behind it is in principle plausable. Although whether it will prove quite as effective as they claim is obviously debatable.
I think it is rather short-sighted to dismiss this product in your manner. I'm guessing that you have never actually tried it, so how can you justify it as "obviously bollocks"??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Shot Heavy Contributor

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 30 Location: Huddersfield, UK
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
This smells like bait but I will resist and just have a little nibble. There is no physical mechanism that can explain how these bands might help. I can't find any research made on them, can you? The company looks like it spends all its money on marketing -Ivan Lendl, SF can't be cheap. Their blurb is mambo-jumbo as others have pointed out.
But listen, like homeopathy, aerogel rackets etc. if it works for you by all means use it! Just because its bollocks doesn't mean it can't help you play better. Performance is as much psychological as it is physical. I prefer sweat bands, which I can at least use to wipe my brow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marro Prolific Contributor

Joined: 04 Jul 2007 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gavster wrote: | | ...the company has obviously spent a considerable amount of time researching their product and the science behind it is in principle plausable... |
Is that really the case? A bunch of pseudoscientific babble is not the same as scientific research. Where exactly is the plausibility in minus ions and/or magnets bringing health benefits and/or pain relief?
| Trion advert on SquashDiscount wrote: | 1. Minus Ions in Trion:Z products increase concentration, performance & the feeling of well being.
2. Magnetic Therapy loosens muscles & increases blood flow to facilitate healing & cell regeneration..
3. Combines Minus-ions & Magnetic Therapy for the most powerful combination availible.
4. 20x to 50x teh minus-ion power of other ionic bracelets. |
Re 1. Minus Ions are in fashion in Japan at the moment, although there doesn't seem to be any scientific evidence to support any claims that they have any medical effect.
Japan Inc.
Re 2.
Magnet Therapy
Magnetic bands claiming pain relief are even on the Fraudulent Devices list for the FDA...
FDA - Fraudulent Devices
Re 3. Adding two dubious claims together to increase the impact?
Re 4. Does this really mean anything? Which other bracelets and does this mean the others' claims are incorrect? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Shot Heavy Contributor

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 30 Location: Huddersfield, UK
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Haasquet wrote: |
I'm not sure I'd call Titanium a "pseudo-science". I mean, it is on the periodic table of the elements. It's not just a buzzword. Also, it has higher tensile strength than graphite, and it does weigh less. |
I can't work out why anyone would use Titanium metal in a racket. Titanium is not stronger nor lighter than graphite (in the form of carbon fibres):
Titanium
Carbon fibre
I am actually looking for a "Titanium" racket that I can destroy and look at in the microscope. If anything there might be some Titanium fibres in amongst the carbon fibres. It's purpose would then be to dampen vibration mostly. In terms of strength all the titanium fibres would do is hold the racket in one piece once it's cracked. But by that time it would be to late, don't you think?
Perhaps pseudo-science is a little strong for Titanium. Now "Aerogel", why would you want to use that?
Aerogel
It's a cool material, sure, but in a racket? What's the point? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pink Panther Contributor
Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 10 Location: Some mysterious place
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I no a certain adult who got very high in the world rankings a few years back and he/she likes the bracelet. I asked an orthopedic?? something or other doctor thingy person who knows a lot about the body.
He says and i quote 'utter crap! There is no scientific factual proof that blood flow increases. If it does don't u think that doctors would use it for heart patients to help improve blood flow',
But they don't. Even if they do work, how can u measure this fact? I'll leave you to ponder on this issue... _________________ The Pink Panther.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mark Prolific Contributor
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doesn`t seem to be any hard evidence for why an ice bath after a game is good for recovery. Man those top ten IDIOTS!
It`s funny, I live in Japan and yes, the minus ion thing is huge here. Everytime I walked by a display hawking them I would think "that`s total crap"
I found it bugging me so much that people were spending 2500yen (25 USD) on something that was so "obviously bollocks" that there was only one thing left for me to do...............................buy one and see what it was all about.
That was three weeks ago. I don`t notice a difference. I have been playing great squash in that time, but i think it`s due more to my new haircut.
All that being said, I kind of like wearing it now. If I lost it, I might even buy a new one. But as mentioned above, the one I bought was half the price of the sarah f one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Shot Heavy Contributor

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 30 Location: Huddersfield, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VolleyDrop Prolific Contributor

Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 153 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: New Study |
|
|
Interesting topic.
The hype of magnet therapy is over the top, crazy marketing which raises all sorts of red flags on my "crap-o-metre."
However, a new study shows some benefit. Check it out: Science Daily Article
Next step: find a good way to experiment on humans.
Personal experience with physiotherapy gives me the impression that my body is sensitive to magnetism and can benefit from it, but I don't think everyone would see the same results. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|